Prilepin’s Chart

Prileipin’s Chart is the result of a lot of Russian research done with Olympic weightlifters. It depicts the optimum number and range of reps given a certain percentage to increase strength. The researchers looked at bar speed, technique, and the lifter’s next competition max and developed the following numbers (for more on Prilepin’s Chart and it’s use on strength training, check out this solid article by Tim Kontos on EliteFTS).

The “Percent” column indicates the percent of the lifter’s 1RM. The “Reps/sets” column represents the range of reps that can occur for a single set. The “Optimal” column shows the optimum number of total reps at this percent range to implement a correct dose of stress (fewer reps would be too low a stress, more reps would cause too much stress). The “Total Range” column indicates the lower and higher extremes a lifter could use when lifting in the indicated percent range. For example, the 55-65% row says that a lifter would use three to six reps per set, the optimal rep total is 24 reps, and the range of total reps is from 18 to 30. If the lifter used sets of 3, they could perform 8 sets to achieve the optimal 24 rep total.

This chart is a very good way to structure a training day, though it isn’t really necessary unless you’re more of an “advanced intermediate” type of lifter (i.e. someone who has been using intermediate programming for at least six months, and probably at least a year). Let’s say you found yourself going hard too often in your training, and de-loads were necessary and often. If you actually looked at your percentages and rep totals, you might find that you’re essentially doing three heavy days a week. Instead, you could fluctuate your week’s training better (perhaps with a Heavy-Medium-Light set up) by orienting your training sessions with Prilepin’s Chart.

If Monday you went heavy, the chart would help you see that “heavy” is anything over 90%. You’d do about four total reps by hitting a couple doubles or some singles, and you definitely wouldn’t breach the ten rep mark — it would just be superfluous training volume at this percentage. If you kept the rep ranges the same, you could aim to improve the weight slightly the following week. This is essentially what is done in the Texas Method and Advanced Texas Method protocols (though numbers of sets and reps are modified for goals, like raw powerlifting).

Prilepin’s Chart also allows for proper progression. If you’re less adapted to using its protocol, then you would stick to the lower end range of reps within a given percentage. For example, instead of using 15 to 20 reps in the 80-90% category, you’d stick to the lower rep range of 10 and build it up over time (perhaps adding a rep or two every week). You can see how it’s easy to apply more stress via total tonnage than simply adding weight, and this is also why you’d want to be more advanced before even worrying about any of this. Less adapted intermediates can make plenty of progress with a good training template and not over working themselves, but this Chart can corral those who are ignorant, belligerent, or not on a given template (hmm, two of those three describe Brent…).

Westside Barbell and Louie Simmons are the primary sources that educated the general strength population on Prilepin’s Chart. Louie based the DE/ME structure on these percentages and rep ranges and has tweaked them over the years (I’d suggest getting a copy of the “Westside Barbell Squat and Deadlift Manual” if you’re interested to see his implementation). Things are tweaked because a) the Westside lifters are using supportive gear and b) the above chart is based on the the quick Olympic lifts. Supportive gear will assist the lifter in his performance, so heavier percentages can be used. The Olympic lifts have a much lower time under tension and can be typically labeled as “sub-maximal” with respect to absolute strength, so a powerlifter or strength athlete will typically use fewer reps than an Olympic weightlifter. Also, Tim Kontos pointed out that a sport athlete (who is running, attending practice, or using a broader range of lifts) will use fewer reps so as not to apply too much stress that would inhibit the rest of the training.

Prilepin’s Chart is a good tool to use for experienced lifters, yet it can give a good programmer a strategy for how to plan his session, week, and training. Take a look at your own training and see how it compares with these rep ranges. If you decide to use it, remember to start with the lower rep ranges. If you experiment with something and it works well, then let us know (but include your stats and previous program). Don’t forget that less experienced lifters will complicate a good progression by trying to adhere to percentage-based training.

35 thoughts on “Prilepin’s Chart

  1. Justin, this Westside themed post is tearing this group apart!

    Just because I say they vary exercises and base their shit on Westside doesn’t make it a Westside post, Paul. C’mon man.


  2. So, Prilipen’s chart can be applied almost universally to each training day, correct? That’s for major lifts (sq/bench/dl) and olympic lifts and not assistance work I would imagine.

    It got me thinking because I have traditionally adhered to the “sets of 5″ or whatever and it would make sense that breaking an optimal range of reps into the proper sets would mitigate fatigue and breakdown of technique.

    Cool chart bro.

  3. Pingback: Quick Article Dump 050912 |

  4. @dhig17 – prilepin’s chart if you use the formulas in the link I posted can be applied in numerous ways and not just “daily”. If you understand basic block periodization you can apply an entire meso-cycle (competition to competition).

    but back to what you asked, those percentages have been shown to work with both General-Specific and Specific movements.

    James “The Thinker” Smith has a document floating around called “classification of the means” in which he defines general, general-specific, and specific movements.

    here it is.

    he goes on to list G, G-S, and S movements for various athletic endeavours. (including olympic lifting and powerlifting).

    Block periodization is pretty fascinating to me, and it obviously works because tons of guys use it. (Mike Tuscherer being one of them, albeit he use the RPE method over percentages, but before he developed the RPE he did use traditional block periodization).

    tl:dr use the table for your competition lifts and BIG compound supplemental movements.

  5. On topic, I am doing a sort of Prilepin’s based deal with my push press and DL right now. Only two weeks in so jury is still out on if I am too stupid to use a simple chart, but hopefully will see some good results.

  6. on a sidenote: I’d be interested to see a list of reference material (books / articles/ websites/ other top S&C coaches…)that you find essential to the strength professional such as Supertraining or, Starting Strength, or Science and Practice of Strength Training.

    Thanks for the great website.

  7. @PatrickStroup: that Hritsov guy must be pretty smart, because he clearly published that article in LaTeX. I wish to christ more people did, especially because I read a lot of blogs on advanced stats and financial math, and I’m sick do death of looking at SQRT(x).

  8. Pingback: » PR Friday — Week In Review

  9. Pingback: Derby City CrossFit | Louisville | Workout of the Day – Thursday 5/17/12

  10. Pingback: The Art and Science of Getting Strong | Crossfit Albuquerque

  11. Pingback: 325kg deadlift, you're next. - Page 177 - Ausbb - Australian BodyBuilding

  12. Pingback: Practical Tips for Prioritizing Quality over Quantity in a CrossFit Setting | Chris Garay

  13. Pingback: » Week of May 19 – May 25 CrossFit Addiction Kennesaw

  14. Pingback: Strength In Numbers | Raleigh CrossFitRaleigh CrossFit

  15. Pingback: History of the Games #5 | Crossfit ManassasCrossfit Manassas

  16. Pingback: Determining Training Needs | Andrew Sacks Sports Performance

  17. Pingback: Pie and Some Sunday Training | I am the Little Fighter

  18. Pingback: J'ai joué dans la cours des grands - CrossFit CapOp

  19. Pingback: Why 10 x 3 Is Best for Strength and Size | Health & Wellness Chicago

  20. Pingback: Today's Workout: 042114 - CrossFit Catalyst

  21. Pingback: Strength | Garage Gym Guy

  22. Pingback: Programming | LIFT, READ, RANT

  23. Pingback: Workout History: GRACE and ISABEL

  24. Pingback: The Deadlift Experiment - Part 1 - Train Heroic

  25. Pingback: Tuesday – 260814 – What scaling should I Do? | Crossfit U West Melbourne

  26. Pingback: Rethinking Percentage Based Training

Leave a Reply